So, how do we put the writing we
have been hearing about to work?
The
authors vote for two simple strategies. The first is to make the WTL first and
last. First when the day begins as a warm up or bell ringer; first as in the beginning
exercise for a new unit; last as the final activity before leaving class. It’s
all about activating thinking.
The Beginning - The New Unit
We’re
all familiar with the Know, Want to Know, Learned (KWL) exercise. It is a useful
tool that can help students access prior knowledge, predict what they do not
know about a subject or set goals for their learning, and after all is said and
done it can alert the teacher to what knowledge has been gained, what
misconceptions have occurred and provide clues about how to proceed.
Along the Way Through the Lesson,
Unit, Semester
The
authors believe that WTLs should be used constantly to help students stop and
collect their thoughts, sort out ideas, notice and hold their thinking (about
the current lesson), review and adjust goals (take responsibility for their
learning), and move on to the launch pad of progression through the lesson,
unit, lab, etc. The writing break is a prelude to other forms of short writing
that will help students do more than memorize facts and roll them into answers.
Synthesis is the next step. It is taking things that have been learned and combining
them into something new.
Think
about the following analogy. Flour, yeast, eggs, sugar, salt, water, oil, baking
soda, and vanilla are ingredients that are known. A bowl is a receptacle for initially
holding them. An oven can be the source of the catalyst (heat in this case)
that can transform the ingredients. A certain type of pan (baking pan) can be
used to contain the catalytic reaction. The ingredients are mixed together,
poured into the baking pan, transferred to the oven, heat applied and after a
certain amount of time the ingredients, with the help of kinetic and heat
energy, containment vessels and the application of a carefully thought out sequence
of events is transformed into a cake. The resultant cake bears no resemblance to
what started as separate components, morphed into a soupy mixture and was
subjected to a reaction chamber.
Hmmmm….sounds
like the churning process inside an inquiring mind that combines information
and turns it into something that is more than the sum of the bits of
information and instructions that went in-synthesis.
Discussion
Writing
is not enough verbal exchange or discussion is required. Confusius and Edgar Dale
agree that doing creates understanding. But how can large-group discussion
provide the “do” component of the learning process. It can’t because only one
student at a time can interact with the discussion leader while the others
wait, wait, wait, lose interest. That is why lots of valuable topic talk must
be done “student-to-student.” The
authors argue that it can be used on its own or as a prelude to stronger but
shorter whole-class discussions.
Short writing
plus focus begets synthesis which equals retention.
I like the analogy to cooking!
ReplyDeleteWarren, I have the exact same idea as you do now (thanks to this reading class) that reading alone is not enough. You need to go through the post-reading activities where you ask your students an invigorating question and have them write about it or have a discussion about what you all just read, or, or, or. Reading alone is just not sufficient!
ReplyDeleteI think you are right. we can use different strategies with our students to create a learning environment for our students because each student understand concepts in different way.
ReplyDeleteI think you are right. we can use different strategies with our students to create a learning environment for our students because each student understand concepts in different way.
ReplyDeleteHello, I'm not sure if my last post posted but was telling you that I really like your blog and agree with you and think that we can use so may strategies and it will be important not to become on dimensional.. great job
ReplyDelete